HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US February 8, 2012
Drug Litigation
             
 
Selecting a drug litigation attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Drug Litigation Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

PAL & AFSCME DC 37 announce $24 million settlement with Serono in case alleging illegal promotion of AIDS drug Serostim
                               

Boston, MA, — The Prescription Access Litigation Project (PAL) and PAL member AFSCME District Council 37 Health and Security Plan (DC 37) today announced a settlement in a nationwide class-action lawsuit brought by DC 37 and others against EMD Serono, Inc. and Merck Serono International S.A. (jointly, Serono) (NYSE: SRA).  The $24-million settlement resolves claims that Serono wrongfully encouraged doctors to prescribe the AIDS drug Serostim to patients for whom it was unnecessary. Serostim is a recombinant human growth hormone manufactured by Serono to treat AIDS wasting, a condition involving profound involuntary weight loss in AIDS patients. 

The lawsuit, filed in September 2005, charged Serono with promoting the use of an unapproved medical device that improperly diagnosed people as having AIDS wasting; providing doctors with travel stipends in exchange for their agreement to prescribe Serostim; and marketing the drug for uses that were not approved by the FDA.

There is no allegation in this case that any patient was medically harmed by Serono’s conduct.

This settlement follows a settlement reached in October 2005 by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).  In that DOJ settlement, Serono agreed to pay $704 million in fines and pled guilty to criminal charges for the unlawful promotion of Serostim. In addition to the monetary settlement with the DOJ, Serono also agreed to a “Corporate Integrity Agreement” that requires internal audits and government monitoring.  The U.S. Attorney in charge of the case asserted that “nearly 85% of prescriptions written for Serostim were not medically necessary.” 

The DOJ settlement reimbursed government programs for their Serostim payments but did not include reimbursement for patients and private health plans that paid out-of-pocket for Serostim treatment.  The lawsuit filed by DC 37 sought to recover Serostim payments for those groups. The settlement agreement in DC 37’s case received preliminary approval from the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts last week and must receive “final approval” from the Court before it goes into effect.

The settlement will establish a fund to reimburse two groups for their Serostim payments:  (1) individual patients who paid the entire cost of Serostim prescriptions or who had private health coverage and were responsible for a co-payment for their prescriptions; and (2) third-party payers -- health insurance plans, union benefit funds and self-insured employers -- that paid for part or all of the cost of Serostim dispensed to their members.  

Alex Sugerman-Brozan, Director of PAL, explains: “We hope that this settlement will not only compensate those consumers and health plans that were deceived into paying unnecessarily for Serostim, but it will also serve as a precedent for other drug companies that would venture to take advantage of seriously ill patients in the name of profits.”

According to Rosaria Esperon, Administrator of the AFSCME District Council 37’s Health & Security Plan in New York City, “This case cried out for justice. Serono’s promotion of Serostim affected some of our most vulnerable members who had to expend their scare resources for co-pays on a drug that was unnecessary.  Our self-administered drug benefit plan too was harmed when it paid the ingredient cost of this hugely expensive drug.  Through this settlement, both our members and our plan have achieved a fair measure of justice.” 

David Nalven, a lawyer with Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, who represents the class, said "This is an excellent result for consumers and third-party payors who paid for Serostim based on unsupported representations -- they are getting their money back." Lance Harke of Harke & Clasby also represents the class in this case. 

The Prescription Access Litigation Project (PAL) is a nationwide coalition of over 125 state, local, and national senior, labor and consumer health advocacy groups in 36 states fighting to make prescription drugs affordable. The organizations in the PAL coalition have a combined membership of over 13 million people. PAL works to end illegal drug industry practices that increase the price of prescription drugs beyond the reach of the American consumer, using class action litigation and public education. Since 2001, PAL members have filed 28 sets of lawsuits targeting such practices.
 
AFSCME District Council 37 Health and Security Plan provides a wide array of health and welfare benefits, including a prescription drug benefit, for 120,000 represented municipal employees and retirees of the City of New York, various authorities and cultural institutions, plus their spouses and dependants for a total of 300,000+ lives.


 


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  Did You Know?
 
Every Single Drug That Affects The Body Will Have Some Side Effects

Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers both the benefits and risks of all medications before approval, side effects are generally not serious. For every drug FDA approves, the benefits are balanced against its risks.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Drug Litigation Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.