HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US March 12, 2010
Drug Litigation
             
 
Selecting a drug litigation attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Drug Litigation Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

$22.7 Million Settlement With Medco Health Solutions Resolving Allegations It Violated The Consumer Protection Laws


HARRISBURG Attorney General Jerry Pappert today announced that Pennsylvania and 19 other states have reached a $22.7 million settlement with the nation's largest pharmacy benefits manager (PBM), Medco Health Solutions Inc., to resolve allegations that the company switched patients to different prescription drugs but failed at times to pass the savings on to the patients or health plans.

Pappert said the national settlement resolved claims under the states' unfair trade practices laws. Pappert said the investigation into Medco's drug switching practices began more than a year ago and was spearheaded by Pennsylvania, Maine and Massachusetts. The states also worked closely with U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan's office in Philadelphia.

"Consumers and their doctors should make the decision of switching from one medication to another based on the best interests of the patient, not because a PBM has found a way to make money," Pappert said. "This settlement ensures that Medco will give patients and doctors the information they need to make these important decisions."

Pappert said states alleged that the drug switches instituted by Medco generally benefited the company but did not always save patients or health plans money. In some cases, Pappert said, the switches did not save enough money to justify the changing of medications because the patients had to pay for follow-up doctor visits and tests. For example, Medco contacted doctors and had patients switched from certain cholesterol lowering medications to Zocor, but that switch often required consumers to receive follow-up blood tests.

Pappert said Medco also failed to disclose to prescribers that the switches would increase rebate payments from drug manufacturers to Medco. He said that Medco also failed to disclose to patients that the company, not doctors, initiated the drug switches and had financial incentives in doing so.

Pappert said the participating states are: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington.

The settlement prohibits Medco from soliciting drug switches when:

The net drug cost of the proposed drug exceeds the cost of the prescribed drug;

The prescribed drug has a generic equivalent and the proposed drug does not;

The switch is made to avoid competition from generic drugs; or

It is made more often than once in two years within a therapeutic class of drugs for any patient.


The settlement requires Medco to:


Disclose to prescribers and patients the minimum or actual cost savings for health plans and the difference in co-payments made by patients;

Disclose to prescribers and patients Medco's financial incentives for certain drug switches;

Disclose to prescribers material differences in side effects between prescribed drugs and proposed drugs;

Reimburse patients for out-of-pocket costs for drug switch-related health care costs and notify patients and prescribers that such reimbursement is available;

Obtain express, verifiable authorization from the prescriber for all drug switches;

Inform patients that they may decline the drug switch and receive the initially prescribed drug;

Monitor the effects of drug switches on the health of patients; and

Adopt a certain code of ethics and professional standards.


In addition, Medco will pay $20.2 million to the states and $2.5 million to patients who incurred expenses related to a certain switch between cholesterol controlling drugs. Pennsylvania's share of the settlement will be $1.8 million. Medco also has agreed to pay the states $6.6 million for fees and costs of litigation.

Pappert said that Pennsylvania has elected to receive $1.8 million in prescription drug cards in lieu of their monetary payment. Pappert said the state's PACE program will give the drug cards to approximately 7,200 seniors to cover their generic drugs for one year.

"I have made it a priority to find ways to lower the cost of prescription drugs for Pennsylvanians," Pappert said. "This case will send a message to all PBMs that we won't allow them to make money at the expense of our citizens."

Medco is the nation's largest PBM, with more than 62 million patients. PBMs contract with health plans to process prescription drug payments to pharmacies for drugs provided to patients enrolled in the health plan.

The settlement was negotiated by James A. Donahue III, Chief Deputy Attorney General of Pappert's Antitrust Section.


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  Did You Know?
 
Every Single Drug That Affects The Body Will Have Some Side Effects

Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers both the benefits and risks of all medications before approval, side effects are generally not serious. For every drug FDA approves, the benefits are balanced against its risks.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Drug Litigation Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.